Welcome to the Billy Meier UFO Research website! › Forum › Miscellaneous › Michael Horns behavioural mentality and sensibilities › Reply To: Michael Horns behavioural mentality and sensibilities
The critics have spent all their time looking at the stupid images and little sometimes none of their time looking at certain realities which have been identified in high intellectual studies only found on google scholar, as if they are somehow smart people when we can see few in the world are smart so why would their interest in conpiracies and cults make them all of a sudden smart after all this time. Like what you did there, you said he said he was a god, when he never said that, and if he did he’s already said Christianity and any religion for that matter is purely delusional, so he clearly said king of wisdom and even that’s been thrown away as just meaning knowledgeable, next your say hes a prophet when he’s said no he’s just a teacher. And that’s not the issue because what your doing there is selecting pieces and fragments and holding onto it fanatically even though it’s a massive archive of data. The position you’ve taken is that everything is wrong, and that position only ever leads to a strange situation when something turns out to be right with just a couple of extra words of detail as if these critic people are aimlessessly firing away and are not familiar with normal things that are known already. We go to university and have invented university because knowing something takes time and effort, and critics think they can just come along and know something because they have this conspiratorial approach and have heard some people talk some random things that sort of make sense. This validates it all for me, because it demonstates that they do not know that even scientists themselves are coming to terms with certain features of reality. It’s not entertainment, Michael Horn makes it entertaining and that is wrong. Have you ever looked at http://dict.figu.org have you ever noticed that all the translations are by volunteers? Have you ever noticed that it is no organisation, most of those interested have given no money at all, never have never will, so if it is a cult, it’s a new style of cult which is difficult to call a cult really in that reality of framework, and the secret is that it studies reality and not delusional stories, even though if you reword some things it can be seen as a story, just like any story, because that’s how authors write stories, but if we look at something specific and carefully review the data and make sure its presented in the correct way to the source texts we can clearly see those things almost always align with a real scenario, it’s just easy for conspiracy people to come along and pick it up without themselves doing any research.