Welcome to the Billy Meier UFO Research website! › Forum › Miscellaneous › Billy Meier vs other Contactees › Reply To: Billy Meier vs other Contactees
I’m aware of that URL and its inaccuracies. First though, because the person who posts all that is rather incapable of deeper reflective thinking, he makes some faulty assumptions, for which he can’t produce any actual evidence. For example, when he tries to show that Meier either was wrong or didn’t publish the info first, he fails to note that he is usually quoting theoretical information, and Meier is always stating things unambiguously as facts, which do turn out to be correct.
He also fails to provide even a remotely credible explanation as to how Meier obtained the information, since most of it’s published by him long before the internet age. Also, the theories he cites were usually published in obscure papers, journals, etc., and only relatively recently were published on the internet.
As far as the Jupiter information goes, Robbins is absolutely wrong. Go to the article regarding the skeptics, Jupiter, Io, etc., and search carefully through the dates and you’ll see what I mean.
This article on the Iceman (https://theyflyblog.com/2016/07/17/otzi-gives-skeptics-ulcers-and-fits/) points out so many specifics that defy mere chance and show a very great likelihood that Meier’s information is also the correct one.
I’d go through each and every one if there was really a reasonable doubt as to Meier’s authenticity and accuracy. I’ve offered to debate any and all of the skeptics but they’ve declined.
The bad joke here is that the skeptic from India is defeated from the very start by the irrefutable authenticity of Meier’s earliest evidence from India in 1964 (https://theyflyblog.com/2017/09/25/its-1964-all-over-again/). This is the first evidence and it established the authenticity of the contacts. Of course there’s more but the skeptics can never get beyond this to begin with.