Welcome to the Billy Meier UFO Research website! › Forum › Miscellaneous › James Fox giving eternal reward for “credible evidence of UFOs” $100,000 › Reply To: James Fox giving eternal reward for “credible evidence of UFOs” $100,000
Hi Nigella I think you’re making a common misunderstanding about the “boomerang effect”. On page 226 of The Psyche, questions were answered clearing up the confusion between “positive and negative” and “good and bad”. If I understand correctly, it says that the polarity (like a magnets polarity) shifts so that the thought can return intensified to the sender as if attracted like a magnet, but good healthy thoughts always return as good healthy thoughts, and bad unhealthy thoughts always return to the sender as bad unhealthy thoughts. The polarity (like a magnet) shifts, but not the good/bad aspect. Could you all please address this in your next episode of Humanity Matters and here on the blog? I appreciate everyones good efforts and I’m sure it will return to you in good ways.
I certainly appreciate Lolo everyone expressing their concerns here. To be honest with you, this is one of the more the complicated ideas which is exactly why I wrote this, not only to solidify my own understanding of it, but also to provoke this very discussion. I must point out I am fully aware of the harm of missionizing, and forcing thoughts on others etc. and that certainly is not my intention. Which is why I did not link this on social media. The people reading this blog are (typically) the ones searching for truth therefore I deemed this a very necessary topic to be addressed and discussed, for, in my opinion, it is important that we cease continuing on with a misunderstanding of such significant concepts such as this, because, in all honesty and all due respect to everyone here as Human Beings, it seems that the majority of us are the ones with the misconceptions here. Granted, it could well be that we are simply talking ourselves in circles in the shadows of our cryptic English language, but I am sensing more than that, so I will try to make the main point here as clear and simple as these limitations allow. Negative IS NOT to be equated with “bad/evil”, and likewise positive IS NOT to be equated with “good” something that is 100% positive is in no wise “good”, but only that which is 100% positive and 100% negative and thus neutral-positive-equalized* (such as the comprehension of this in and of itself.)
Everyone, please have the respect to read this article carefully(!)
*another complicated concept to be addressed and discussed at some point