“You proceed on the premise that aliens are real yet somehow want to present a false ET contact case.”
It’s a simple question, Ed. If you do not believe extraterrestrials exist, then your answer would be, “no” followed by, “because I don’t believe in aliens”.
“What would be a valid motive for such an action?”
To offer guidance to a planetary society that badly needs it without forcing them to accept open contact before they are collectively ready.
“If you want to use this theory to explain away all the gaping holes in the Meier case than I simply disagree.”
Example?
“You’re still trying to champion Meier because you lost all critical thought and believe in every word he uttered.”
How did I “champion” Meier when I never even mentioned him? Explain to me how I’ve lost critical thinking. Why are you so sure that you have any yourself? And why do you think you know what I believe about what Meier says or writes? Have I ever talked about it? You make WAY too many assumptions, Ed.
