Welcome to the Billy Meier UFO Research website! › Forum › Miscellaneous › Introduction › Reply To: Introduction
@ said:
So again …let me see if I have this correct, Billy’s daytime photographs have been shown beyond reasonable doubt by Phil Langdon I would imagine you mean, Phil who refuses to let anyone on the internet see the full resolution images of his own recreations to actually compare them…and you who have taken it upon yourself to collect all the available data on the Meier case (read-destroy Meier) agree that this is the correct way to conduct research.
I meant MANY (not all) photos and videos supposedly taken by Meier (Ex: space trip, WCUFO, Energy ships, etc.) were, beyond reasonable doubt, shown to be either outright fakes or most certainly fakes. This automatically casts severe doubt on the rest of his so-called evidence and stories. Having said that, I don’t see any point in Phil supplying high-res images of his photos when what Meier provided were copies of copies that are multiple generations away from the supposedly-stolen originals. Comparison will prove nothing at all. We have top level photo experts from IPI institute in University of Southern California (1980 video will be released in time) saying that the internegatives made in Switzerland by Wendelle from the supposed-originals and brought back to USA for analysis are worthless for verifying the authenticity of Meier’s beamship pictures. They demanded to see the originals, which of course were suspiciously missing. If you disagree with their expert-conclusions, I would like to see your reasoning behind you insisting on non-original photo comparisons. Also, would like to know how it would effect the genuineness or lack of it of Meier’s images.