Reply To: Michael Horns behavioural mentality and sensibilities

[Oliver]

Fact is that 99.99% of UFO researchers know and are aware that Meier is a blatant hoaxer and charlatan. So is his partner in crime Mike Horn who lies through his teeth at every podcast.

When you ask him about the original, first edition prints containing the prophecies/predictions from the 70s/80s the hypocrite and pathological liar Mike Horn keeps posting an Amazon link to supposedly order Meier’s contact reports from the 70s/80s.The description reads as follows:

“These are the contact notes of Swiss farmer Eduard “Billy” Meier as originally presented and interpreted in English by the Dean of UFO/ET studies, Wendelle C. Stevens, in a newly edited 30th anniversary 2nd edition, completely revisioned and rewritten by editor Ted Denmark, Ph.D. with numerous color photos of the ET Pleiadian “beamships” taken by Meier.”

Features and Details:
Publication Date: May 17, 2013

All manipulated and retrodicted.

As his fake sock-puppet ‘Taro’, He also keeps failing to explain how the fake ‘PhD’ Rhal Zahi calculated the distance from Meier’s camera to WCUFO. Furthermore he failed to take control pictures ANY serious and unbiased investigator would have taken at Meier’s property infront of fixed reference points. The analysis was never peer reviewed but WE are supposed to believe a pseudo-scientists claim based on assumptions only??!
How gullible and naive they think people are?

Since the first contacts until now Meier and his alien chums have achieved absolutely nothing. So why even bother to contact a secluded Swiss farmer in the first place? Think about it logically.
And if the intent was to create CONTROVERSY then all you guys should accept the non-believers opinions and stop to vigourously convince them that this case is authentic.