Welcome to the Billy Meier UFO Research website! › Forum › Miscellaneous › Introduction › Reply To: Introduction
The pictures, especially the daytime pictures, have always been the most ‘popular’ aspect of the case.
Is this why “UFO” is in BMUFOR’s name? Because there’s very little actual UFO research.
I could be wrong but I think the Wendelle team has come closest to a conclusive result, as they got pictures from Meier himself.
What exactly do you mean by, “conclusive”? Photos of UFOs can never, by themselves prove the existence of extraterrestrials conclusively. However, Stevens did “conclude” that their exhaustive investigation could not determine hoax. The more evidence a UFO case has, the more significant this becomes.
You’ve earlier requested hi res pictures of Phil Langdon, which you apparently didn’t get, but even if you got them and you were able to prove from the pictures the ships were models, it doesn’t say a damn thing about Meier’s pictures.
I want hi-res images of Langdon’s debunk attempts too. But not to determine it’s a model since we already know this. The value is in making side-by-side comparisons with Meier’s originals, particularly #808 since this is the only hi-res close-up of the WCUFO Meier has released(that I’m aware of).
So what do you expect of BMUFOR?
To drop the “UFO”. Why did you choose to include it in the first place? Good for the Google search, I suppose.
Mahesh (and I, who assisted him in the prophecies/predictions investigation) were very much convinced the case was real, and that we would find mountains of evidence that would support this position. It was only by years of research (and disappointment) that we were forced to conclude the opposite.
Mahesh is avoiding me, so I’ll ask you too:
Is it POSSIBLE for aliens to have staged a fake UFO hoax?
I would imagine it might be difficult to accept plausible deniability too if it nullified all of my hard work. But it does account for the many things that cannot be explained any other way. BMUFOR’s research lacks a scientific perspective. When Meier’s evidence is put up to a higher level of scrutiny the hoax theory falls apart. Maybe you weren’t “forced” to conclude hoax so much as chose: When you actually understand the science that has gone into each of the numerous analyses, a one-armed hoaxer makes no sense.