Welcome to the Billy Meier UFO Research website! › Forum › Miscellaneous › Michael Horns behavioural mentality and sensibilities › Reply To: Michael Horns behavioural mentality and sensibilities
Rhal Zahis’ poor report/analysis of the energy ships is full of assumptions and speculations. One can see the obvious outline of a streetlamp which create vertical lens flares bleeding into the posts under it due to overexposure. Also multiple images of the post are cleary visible in Meier’s picture. You can even count them and know how many Meier liar used.
Rhal Zahi is a brainwashed Meier apologist and therefore he is defending this scam. The ‘beams of light’ he calls ‘mysterious’ are just simple flares from the overexposed lamp and the post below it.
I suggest that verybody reads Mahesh’s excellent report on it here at billymeieruforesearch.com. Ex FIGU members exactly duplicated the method Meier used. Mahesh’s report debunks Meiers fraud 100%.
Rhal Zahi should take a photography class bevause he is NOT a real investigator/analyst. He lacks any knowledge of what constitutes a real, valid photographic analysis by taking control pictures to duplicate the method. Also a real investigator would use his real name and not a pseudonym.
Rhal Zahi also hosts the Billy for Kids website which is proof how biased he is. Another red flag. He is not even a ‘PhD’ as Mike Horn claims on his website. He is just a teacher and hobby astronomist. Where are his credentials as a photographic expert analyist? How many UFO investigations besides Meier’s has he done? Rahl Zahi has done NONE other, except Meier’s, therefore he does not have the competence and authority to even voice his opinion. Horn just hired him to convince gullible people with his convoluted and biased report so that Horn can keep selling Meier’s bibles.
Meier the pathological liar, scumbag and charlatan has to be exposed all over the internet.