Reply To: Michael Horns behavioural mentality and sensibilities

[Taro]

Just because Phil didn’t manage to get it
100% to YOUR satisfaction only doesn’t mean
it can’t be done.

Not to MY satisfaction but to Isaac Newton’s. Are you familiar with him? I bet you think he invented the Fig Newton, but no.

The 1st: “An object at rest stays at rest and an object in motion stays in motion with the same speed and in the same direction unless acted upon by an unbalanced force.”

Since the model’s tether point allows it to wobble(or swing) freely in any direction, it is balanced while nothing is acting on it. As soon as an operator pulls on a control line, an UNBALANCED FORCE is applied. This causes the model’s center of gravity to swing like a mini-pendulum from the tether point, or wobble. This is basic science.

A three point hook-up with
fishing- or thin steel wire would steady the
model tremendously.

Pure speculation. Tool of the hack. Where are these three points attached to? How many control lines? You know Meier only has one arm, right?

Pulling the Control line a
bit sooner will get what you refer as the ‘270 turn’.

Pure speculation. Why has no one been able to do it in over 40 years?

Pathetic and laughable to even discuss this childish hoax.

Well, Phil couldn’t duplicate Meier’s UFO maneuvres. Are you calling Phil a child?