Reply To: Billy Meier vs other Contactees

[Taro]

No, I don’t think they created an

actual verifiable hoax

although at the moment I do not rule out the use of small drones. I believe most if not all of the UFO evidence they’ve allowed was designed to have a hoaxy gloss on the surface but a deep look reveals the alien reality. It’s a puzzle for us to solve if we choose to. The fact that new things are still being discovered about the UFO stuff(Rhal Zahi’s work, for example) decades after it was first released demonstrates the depth to which these puzzles go to and the lengths to which they’ve gone to for the sake of plausible deniability. I believe there’s more yet to be discovered. But back to your first question, again all of the UFO stuff was, in my opinion, meant to be verifiably genuine. All the disappearing originals(photo, movie, metal-crystal) was part of the plan to ensure the controversy would last. Maybe they will mysteriously reappear someday, maybe not. But what’s left still has value for study.

As for the CR’s there’s a few things I personally suspect to be false:

The first one that got my attention was that Jitchi(sp?) character from Meier’s travels with Asket. He seems to be a little out of place. The fact that Asket would accept a complete stranger who, regardless of her telepathic and other advanced skills, could pose a risk to safety on a time-travel mission. Meier bopping him in the nose, Asket letting him loose on a trip into the past, the whole thing stinks of a fictional character.

Their explanation for the Hill’s case. First they said it was genuine then they said they were wrong, it had to do with Earth’s magnetism or something. There’s no doubt the Hills are genuine and they at least believe in the story they’ve given as well as supporting testimony from external sources regarding their honesty and character. The fact that their versions line up as well as the star chart Betty described are the main things that have me convinced ETs were involved. So, I think this was part of the Plejaren plan to call all other contactees but Meier false. I believe they’re doing this to give hoax theorists another logically flawed reason to justify their position in their own minds.

San Fran earth quake photo explanation. According to Quetzal, the Baavi mistakenly transmitted the image at least a year too early but I think this was entirely deliberate. So far, the only real indication that the GEO mag painting and Meier’s original earthquake pics don’t match is Wendelle Stevens’ detailed explanation of Meier’s originals.

The term, “beamship”. I think this was deliberate to make “Billy” Eduard Albert Meier(BEAM) look like an egotistical sci-fi writer or something along those lines.

That’s all I can think of, off hand.