Reply To: Billy Meier vs other Contactees

[Pedro Bourbon]

Try pseudoscience and pseudoarcheology. You are not wrong Ed, that is how it is. Have to remember there are all sorts of vulnerable persons who find the information and they know that, they are helping Meier and FIGU to help others to help themselves. Plenty of people don’t care about all the other contactees and they are not as interesting. Cult leader is a value judgement of your own and doesn’t match it right. Ed I don’t want to try to help you be more successful about your criticism but you are not successful with it and you constantly try maliciously to make it into something it is not. I mean calling Meier a cult leader is stupid AF he is no leader, he is a very private man.

You are looking for something reliable to grind against Ed V. Try pseudoscience and pseudoarcheology, you have read the contact reports you said? If you have then you would know that 30% of it has nothing to do with UFOs and is about ancient history, and Meiers story is not supported by scientists, archaeologists, biologists, doctors, physicians, palaeontologists, physicists. Alright, so take this would you please FFS and grind against something FFS which has some real merit and substance and stop STOP UNDERWHELMING everyone. Meier has told a story which is unacceptable, stop trying to portray him maliciously like a mug and tackle the controversy that his and the extraterrestrials entire story is unsupported by proper professionals in university and professional fields as I listed.