Topic: Billy Meier vs other Contactees « Billy Meier UFO Research

Tagged: contactee, plausible deniability

This topic has 221 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 4 years, 1 month ago by pleiadian_handhorn_clow.

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 222 total)

← 1 2 3 … 5 6 7 … 13 14 15 →

Author

Posts
January 17, 2018 at 6:46 AM #9073
William Verhulst
Guest
Bodie Penn & Ed V. I think Owen means that small details have not been included and they are the best details and that’s twatty.

Like any story if you leave out the parts that make it a good story worth listening and want to disguise reality behind a thin veil that makes critics look like idiots. Like finding nemo story. Billys version of finding nemo would be:

the blue fish imparted great knowledge to the shoal before they divided from the shoal and the delusional one followed the great father as he searched.

But if you use google translate on the German half 4-5 times and blend together the results you get.

The not faint hearted clown fish gave his children a good education and family a good life. His son left for another part of the ocean and his father put great efforts into finding him again while joined by a confused fish which was blue.
January 17, 2018 at 10:14 PM #9075
vaseline
Guest
The egg wants to be smarter than the chicken.
January 17, 2018 at 10:22 PM #9076
William Verhulst
Guest
I don’t believe its the case here because Ed said he did read the contact reports and no one would lie to themselves about something that trivial, why, what motive? I think Ed is aware that the Plejaren are playing a small game with many other space visitors, because he has read the content, he knows that they have technology equal to theirs in some cases and had to be careful about the photo opportunities etc because other intelligences would go to those points in time were the locations revealed and some of the intelligences are dangerous, as he knows because he’s read the content. So I don’t agree with your assumption that Ed is that vaseline. I am not sure where he’s at to be honest, after his admission that he’s read the conversations, but I know he’s not that.
January 17, 2018 at 11:31 PM #9077
Eugene Presley Berryrod
Guest
What is going on here?! Why so many comments.
January 18, 2018 at 10:14 AM #9081
Ed V.
Guest
The last sentence of the interview is something to contemplate..
February 4, 2018 at 3:09 PM #9120
Ed V.
Guest
February 7, 2018 at 1:48 AM #9122
Winky Fjord
Guest
```
<html>
 <body>
  <iframe src="https://youtu.be/uy_0j8vlnj8"
   width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 </body>
</html>
```
February 7, 2018 at 10:14 PM #9123
Ed V.
Guest
February 10, 2018 at 6:06 PM #9124
William Verhulst
Guest
The wiki http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Horn saise that yeburp allegations against mr Harn back in 2011 for having his body rebuked and intimidated for sexual gain, volume and rebutted of his bottom for pleasure and he had his genital defamed and had a defamatory allegation against his body rebuke and there was reasonable doubt about his bodies rebuttle but substantial denial, looking not seeing and his back passage was placed under the publics magnifying glass for proof.
February 10, 2018 at 8:53 PM #9125
qanon miggins
Guest
Pizzagate in your face! Tomatto, This is the calm before the storm bros, the calm before the storm, there’s gaina be a blow out shit storm diarare bru&. Hello my name is a qanon. I have the cheddar topper cheese melt quality entertainment for your conspiracy theoriest bros and I expose all clit-ons, obamacare biachies, breaxfast quossants, fruitmas cakes, soda bumpops and pulmonary hip hijab replacements. I got this down bros all you need is to talk about harking and crarking and shi and I am the best YouTube has to offer. YouTube ‘qanon miggins the real cheddar man’ and watch me pretend to get my penis out in public but don’t for legal reasons. See you there bros. qanon.
February 11, 2018 at 12:10 PM #9126
Ed V.
Guest
http://nordicencounter.blogspot.nl/
February 12, 2018 at 9:03 PM #9127
Simon Lehmen
Guest
Your link http://nordicencounter.blogspot.nl/ Ed. That story is one of the better stories… This is why is only subscribe to Billy and Billy’s story. Billy’s story doesn’t have any wishful thinking, and fantasy or mistaken identity. Billy has been fully informed since he was 5, taught on a regular basis, told exactly the way things absolutely are. This link to me demonstrates why there are no other contactees it is only Billy and will only ever be Billy… But there are crazies, wishers and fruitcakes and plenty of them, and that is why I believe Billy even more because he has gone a step further and create a strange set of evidence in order to catch or identify them.

Thanks Ed, you did me a real favor and have helped me realise even more that Billy is who he is and what he says it is and why his evidence is what it is.
February 12, 2018 at 9:09 PM #9128
Simon Lehmen
Guest
FYI this is how a sane individual without mental health condition has an encounter with extraterrestrials. Horst Fenners encounter in Bolivia 1976 (The Trinidad Letter) http://www.meiersaken.info/Proxima_Centauri.html – see what the difference is with those two people and how one in unreal and one is in real.
February 13, 2018 at 8:47 PM #9129
Ed V.
Guest
Actually Simon, there’s an open secret in Ufology which I figured out years ago studying this subject. If you’re really sincere and your intentions are honest about having a Contact you can have a UFO experience yourself! There are Others out there willing to show it to you. People like Steven Greer, Timothy Good and David Hughes-Narborough have experimented with solliciting for contact and got remarkable results. So my challenge to you Meier supporters is ‘go out there and find out for yourselves..’
February 15, 2018 at 5:24 AM #9130
Simon Lehmen
Guest
Are you sure they are not mixing up awareness with sighting? And did you mean to say contact or sighting, quite a big difference?

Awareness of ghosts or the technological noises a human body makes happens when people focus on the subject for months… Is that what you mean? They focus on looking at the sky and them bam a thing appears one day? Or do you mean they focus on having a conversation with an extraterrestrial and then one day bam they think themselves into a weird relationship with some random stranger in a wordless encounter on the metro.

Meier supporters will not like that Ed, they’ll argue that without material telepathy the persons are thinking wishfully & loudly in their heads and seeing UFOs more often because of looking more often at the sky, generally where to look to see them.

I am interested in these remarkable results have you found some good links?
Author

Posts