Welcome to the Billy Meier UFO Research website! › Forum › Miscellaneous › Introduction › Reply To: Introduction
“What exactly do you mean by, “conclusive”? ”
In this case a conclusion that the objects are definitely large, which would most likely mean Meier’s claim of what they are is correct.
“However, Stevens did “conclude” that their exhaustive investigation could not determine hoax.”
With regard to the pictures, as far as I know they never had any originals to examine. So I think that conclusion is not very useful. But honestly, the pictures have never been my greatest interest in the meier case, so I’m not an expert on this issue.
“The value is in making side-by-side comparisons with Meier’s originals”
But the point is there are no originals, no researcher ever got the originals, so you can’t make a valuable comparison.
“To drop the “UFO”. Why did you choose to include it in the first place? Good for the Google search, I suppose.”
It’s just a damn name, get over it, but yeah, you need something catchy. What’s wrong with that?
“Is it POSSIBLE for aliens to have staged a fake UFO hoax?”
Yeah, sure. But from a terrestrial researcher’s perspective the evidence would point to a hoax, so he would conclude it most likely is a hoax. Sure you can come up with some alternative theory that aliens have staged a hoax, but if we never get to see the real thing, how are you ever going to prove it? Maybe Genesis is true and God put dinosaur bones in the ground to test our faith. Maybe the moon is made of cheese and NASA tries to conceal this for the general public, because they want to secretly sell the cheese to aliens to cover the expenses for their secret base on Mars, which is made of chocolate by the way.
If aliens stages a fake ufo hoax, what value does it have for us anyway? A bunch of aliens telling us BS? As far as I’m concerned, they can fuck off.
But the point of Meier’s story seems to be they have some valuable teachings to bring us. So why would they do anything else than to do their best to gain our trust and come of as reliable as possible? Why give prophecies that have the same mistakes as the newspapers and are only published after fulfillment? Why send us impulses with pictures that are identical to frames from old space pictures, and give some horseshit explanation that isn’t even compatible with the facts? Why rip off ‘spiritual teachings’ from other writers?
I don’t see why I should go to such great lengths and still try to uphold this billy meier story in the face of so much BS. If there’s something ‘real’ about it after all, it’s still covered in shit.