Welcome to the Billy Meier UFO Research website! › Forum › Miscellaneous › Michael Horns behavioural mentality and sensibilities › Reply To: Michael Horns behavioural mentality and sensibilities
Michael Horn,
In much of the same way you had to test Billy on the authenticity of this supposed case, keep in mind that the same is necessary for the rest of us.
You do realize most of these alleged prophesies are no prophesy after the fact for most of us reading them, don’t you and especially if human involvement is in the equation in any other prophesies for the future?
I say this because how can we know if there is collaboration with other authorities to arrange for these prophecies? How is the public to know?
In terms of the extraterrestrial hardware, the alleged authentication is actually on the word of a few investigators, who can also allege a claim ( I always had a problem with that “Wedding Cake” looking UFO that didn’t move when Billy asked for Ptaah to do so near that tree).
What I am really trying to say is, this case has with it that same uncertain aspect in its equation, “to BELIEVE” or “NOT TO BELIEVE”.
This is no different than any other religious following, operated by few insiders.
If extraterrestrials want the public to know, I highly doubt the reason for panicking a segment of the populations is a good reason at all.
Governments do a fine job of creating public hysteria on its own as it is already, but let’s say you think the reason is VALID, why would ETs bank on one man, instead of random contacts around the globe as an option by whatever means necessary?
Are you beginning to see what I mean?
Contacts alleged by a single man is His alleged experiences and no one else’s.
Also, Billy’s meeting with past well known notable figures do bring suspicions into this case, such as Saddam Hussein and others.
Michael Horn,
Are you aware that “evidence” is NOT proof?
That question is brought to you because I am THINKING and it keeps me honest.
You also fail to question why this “evidence” you mentioned never developed into PROOF with that wedding cake looking UFO not moving by that tree in the video ( with Billy standing in front of the film camera).
That in itself is QUESTIONABLE and I see no reason for why it did not move when it is said by you, Billy was attempting to get it to move.
I also remember you were asked by someone who interviewed you, what if you find out the case was hoaxes, what would you say then?
Do you remember your response was related to how did he do it?
Well, I just gave you a possible reason how a single man focused upon could actually pull it off, and that would be by what I mentioned earlier in my previous reply.
So, having said that, we STILL are back to square one, this alleged case STILL has in its equation the BELIEF factor and it matters not what eyewitnesses see flying in our skies, as these objects do NOT reveal their origins in any different way than a jetliner can tell you which airport it took off from while at 30,000 feet in the sky with witnesses viewing it at that altitude.
Until your claimed “evidence” becomes PROOF, belief will ALWAYS be a factor concerning all of this, on the words of one man or a few men.
And don’t forget what I said about prophesy and its human factor with those controlling the world, because they have all of the cards of manipulation of those following ORDERS.
Michael Horn,
You have taken the dangerous unsustainable position. I hope the new prophecies and predictions document you publish soon will have an event inside so undeniably weirdly real accurate clarity prediction that a time machine would surely have to have been used to gather the description because these placebo and nocebo prophecies are a way of deterring actions when we want a demonstration of the insider knowledge, we want to support the story and believe it but we need the evidence level to match the allegation, a profound allegation needs a profound proof it’s 1 for a 1.